1. News & Issues

Discuss in my forum

Stephen Wagner

New Loch Ness Monster photo

By August 4, 2012

Follow me on:

Nessie photo by George Edwards

Long-time hunter of the Loch Ness Monster, George Edwards, believes he now has proof that the legendary creature is real in the form of a new picture he took recently. Edwards spends about 60 hours a week on the loch, providing tours on his boat Nessie Hunter IV.

Many skeptics think the so-called monster is just a large sturgeon, but Steve Feltham, another Nessie hunter, says the new picture proves otherwise: "'I would say it doesn't prove what Nessie is, but it does prove what Nessie isn't -- a sturgeon ... this hasn't got a serrated spine like the sturgeon." Read more.

Comments

August 4, 2012 at 1:12 pm
(1) Dale R says:

To me it looks like an animal, it seems to have that profile. You can tell that it’s moving by the way the waves are moving away from it’s structure. Other than that it’s hard to tell what it is because there’s nothing there to measure size towards, like a building or island in the background, so it could be a small fish for all I know, eating on some bait that was thrown out. There needs to be more evidence and more things to compare it to, is there a larger image or a complete image of this sighting with comparable objects in the background?

August 4, 2012 at 1:17 pm
(2) Dale R says:

Nevermind, I see you can click to go to the article. When you view the size of this it seems close to the boat or origin of the image. When you look you can see the distance of it’s not that far out meaning the object may have a maximum length of around 5 feet long which indeed could be a large fish. In this image you can tell clearly that it’s not something that huge.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/08/03/article-2183094-145BAD17000005DC-198_634x423.jpg

August 4, 2012 at 1:33 pm
(3) trixter says:
August 4, 2012 at 6:11 pm
(4) Wilna says:

Look this can be anything. We just recently saw two ostriches swim in the sea!. This could be a dead animal floating in the water!
No proof at all! If he has been searching for so long surely he would have a video camera on hand or a fast shutter camera that can shoot several pictures per second? Or am I just being “blonde” here?
Wilna

August 4, 2012 at 6:35 pm
(5) Sharon says:

That could be anything. For somebody who has been chasing this thing for 60 years, you’d of thought he could have at least got a clearer picture.

August 4, 2012 at 8:44 pm
(6) grace says:

Looks more like an otters back..

August 4, 2012 at 9:35 pm
(7) GREGORYJO says:

WHY DON’T YOU BELIEVE IT? YOU BELIEVE IN SANTA CLAUS, THE EASTER BUNNY AND SOME DUDE WHO NO ONE ELSE HAS SEEN, DON’T YOU CALL HIM GOD? OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

August 4, 2012 at 10:27 pm
(8) WilliWonka says:

Why is that every pic of the Lock Ness Monster is always fuzzy and blurry? Does it exist or not? Who knows but by now with all the pic ability that is in the market why would it always be a fuzzy pic no one can make out.

August 4, 2012 at 10:54 pm
(9) Dave says:

Well, if we could really prove, or disprove this, it would ruin the whole mystery.That is the real reason there is no picture, or true evidence. The simple fact is, the tourist trade requires this “unknown” phenom. People like not knowing for sure. Trust me here, every single inch of that lake has been scanned, and satellite imagery has seen every moving living thing there 100 times over. We will “NEVER” know the truth, and that is on purpose.

August 4, 2012 at 10:55 pm
(10) Jack Manning says:

Wrong again. This is actually Big Foot taking a swim.

August 4, 2012 at 10:56 pm
(11) alex says:

Two eyes, two ears. A chin, a mouth, 10 fingers, two nipples, a butt, two kneecaps, a penis. I have just described to you the Loch ness Monster, and the reward for its capture…all the riches in Scotland. So I have one question: why are you here?
-Creed Bratton

August 5, 2012 at 12:06 am
(12) stonewarrior says:

its a razorback man

August 5, 2012 at 1:15 am
(13) chuck says:

This loser spends his life looking for something that has been recently admitted to be a hoax by somebody’s grandpa and has to validate his life now.

August 5, 2012 at 1:18 am
(14) chuck says:

Look close! Can’t you see it’s Jesus?

August 5, 2012 at 1:27 am
(15) Saad says:

This picture proofs nothing.it could be anything a fish or a bigger fish or any animal..how can this be a loch ness….????

August 5, 2012 at 1:33 am
(16) mdtrex says:

look Loch Ness is only at the oldest 5-7 million years old.It was gouged out by successive ice-age glaciers.The Plesiosaurs went extinct roughly 65 million years ago.Now throw in the countless ways with computers to manipulate photo’s,and it’s a closed case.To sustain a breeding population of animals that large in size and to never have any physical evidence is also highly suspect

August 7, 2012 at 2:20 am
(17) waheed najam says:

The existence of this creature has never been conclusively or scientifically proved despite many missions undertaken. Till then it will remain a tale that inspires awe like so many other myths.

August 7, 2012 at 3:59 am
(18) katybelle says:

Some idiotic comments here why bother some aren’t even funny.

August 8, 2012 at 2:41 pm
(19) LUVBUGG says:

I AGREE WITH KATYBELLE IF YOU’RE NOT FACSINATED BY ALL THE PARANORMAL STUFF ON THIS SITE WHY ARE YOU EVEN LOOKING AT IT, SOMETIMES AS HUMANS WE NEED SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN AND SOMETHING TO CAPTURE OUR IMAGINATIONS :)

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.